- From: Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@muellerware.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:54:15 -0400
James Graham wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Mueller
>> <pmuellr at muellerware.org> wrote:
>>> This is the first time I've seen the requirement for such a beast.
>>> You can
>>> understand the desire for it, given the context, but still. Does
>>> anything
>>> else in JavaScript make use of such a data structure?
>>
>> It says that JavaScript should just use Object. Isn't that,
>> essentially, an ordered dictionary?
>
> Yes. Indeed there are compatibility requirements for the ordering of
> ordinary user-created Object Objects in web browser implementations; the
> order of enumeration must be the same as the order of insertion of the
> properties.
Interesting. I guess this is a "JavaScript in web browser
implementation" difference from the "JavaScript spec". Following the
links in jresig's blog post
http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-in-chrome/
in the "for loop order" section.
Still doesn't seem like it makes sense to go ahead and build
dependencies on this (unfortunate, IMO) behavior.
--
Patrick Mueller
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 10:54:15 UTC