- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax+whatwg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:29:17 +0200
Well that could be a good answer indeed Now let's try to dig into the subtilties on Unicode For example what does the spec says about an attribute whose name is data-K (where we have this unicode sequence U+0064 U+0061 U+0074 U+0061 U+002D U+212A ) ? Is it allowed ? If not why ? That's why I think everywhere in the spec, where ASCII is meant, it should be explicit. If not it would clash with a Unicode understanding IMHO Mohamed On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl>wrote: > I suppose that converting a string to uppercase is an action relevant > only to cases where only ASCII character set is allowed in the argument, > such as HTML element names. Within this restricted application domain, > converting to uppercase has the same effect as converting to uppercase > ASCII. > > IMHO, > > Chris > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090404/4aedeefb/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2009 01:29:17 UTC