W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2009

[whatwg] Worker feedback

From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:02:59 -0700
Message-ID: <5dd9e5c50904021302j1b9b3cbw29207da66904a2a3@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Drew Wilson <atwilson at google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote:
>>  We don't know how much (if any) performance must be sacrificed, because
>> no-one's tried to implement parallel cookie access with serializability
>> guarantees. So I don't think we can say what the correct tradeoff is.
> The spec as proposed states that script that accesses cookies cannot
> operate in parallel with network access on those same domains. The
> performance impact of something like this is pretty clear, IMO - we don't
> need to implement it and measure it to know it exists and in some situations
> could be significant.

I agree with everything Drew said, but I think think this one point really
needs to be singled out.  Cookies go across the wire.  Serializable
semantics are not possible in todays (latent) world.  Period.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090402/50c15c3f/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 13:02:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:11 UTC