- From: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:26:52 +0200
Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but it looks to me as if RDFa uses namespaced identifiers nowhere outside attribute values right now. So couldn't you just introduce a "rdf specific" namespacing system for example like eRDF does[1]? This way, RDF parsers could still look up metainformation about RDF properties while RDF-unaware agents could parse the attribute values as simple text. [1] http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml#schemas On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > Both introducing a namespace prefix processing model and introducing DOM > inconsistencies at the XML/HTML boundary intentionally are simply not an > option in WHATWG specs at this point. Experience borne out of mechanisms > that have had these characteristics [1] has shown these problems to be > simply unacceptable for a Web authoring-level specification. This is > feedback I have received from browser vendors and authors a lot. > > ([1] e.g. XML namespaces, which has the former characteristic when used in > XHTML1 documents processed as XML and the latter characteristic when used > in XHTML documents processed as HTML4.) > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 05:26:52 UTC