- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 03:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Is it intentional that the vtab change didn't cause a change to vtab > treatment when expanding NCRs? Yes; why would it cause a change? The character still passes through, it's just not treated as whitespace. (It's not like U+000D, which is converted to U+000A.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 1 September 2008 20:48:39 UTC