- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:32:39 +1100
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Eric Carlson wrote: > >> >> On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Chris Double wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> That's not the question. The question is whether the looping attributes >>>> are >>>> needed at all. It seems that there's some desire for simple looping, >>>> e.g. >>>> background sounds. That does not require the five attributes the >>>> specification currently provides though. Rather, it requires one simple >>>> boolean attribute. >>> >>> I agree. I think the simple boolean attribute seems clearer and more >>> useful. Which attributes exactly are being considered for removal? I'm >>> assuming these ones: >>> >>> playCount >>> loopStart >>> loopEnd >>> currentLoop >>> >>> start and end would remain, yes? >>> >> After thinking about this, I'm not sure that limiting playback to a >> section of a media file will be used very often. A developer can easily >> script the same functionality as long as they don't use the default >> controller, so it seems to me that attributes for this aren't warranted. > > I think they are useful if you want to: > > a) Loop a fragment (might be useful for audio for the same reason people > chop up a single large image to use multiple background images) Does having a boolean loop attribute (also included in the DOM) satisfy your needs? > b) Use the default controls and get the right behavior. This is pretty > important, I don't think we should require writing a full custom set of > media controls just to be able to play a fragment without getting clearly > bogus UI. I think controlling a video or audio player requires a decent javascript API. Mabye we are still lacking in that respect. But I don't think start and end should be a feature of html elements, because if they are mainly used for dynamic stuff, they are not well expressed as attributes. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 09:32:39 UTC