- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > Great! Thanks. I think your idea of making rel="help" be relative to the > > > > nearest parent <label> is a good one. We could also say it is relative > > > > to > > > > the nearest parent <label>, <body>, <section>, <form>, <fieldset>, or > > > > other such grouping element. I'll look at this in more detail when > > > > defining the rel="" values. > > > Cool. The idea is that the thing is really reliably discoverable - > > > otherwise authors will come up with something that makes sense but breaks > > > the implicit model that the spec is built on. I am actually not sure that > > > we mean the same thing when we say "nearest" but I will talk to you off > > > the list about that to clarify that in my mind :-) > > > > Ok. > > > > rel=help is now defined to apply to the link element's parent and its > > children. > > Would it make sense to say that if <link rel=help> appears in the head, that > it appears to the whole page? It's said that for some time now. :-) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 08:19:54 UTC