- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote: > > I'm not sure I'm understanding the whole function of the <cite> element, > and perhaps I'm bothering again with ids and references, but the > relationship between a <cite> and a quotation could be disambiguated by > coupling an id and a reference to that id. Why is the ambiguity a problem? > Q: What problem does it solve? > Uhm... perhaps a first cite could be a complete reference, i.e. a book name > along its author, publisher and IBAN code, or a reference to another > site/blog, its author and a link to the page with the quoted text. Ok, and > now? Let's say any other reference to the same sorce could be shorter and > without the need of any markup, but for styling, while the quotation block > could remind the whole sorce to the reader, for instance, when the user moved > his pointer over it, or focuses the <blockquote>, a tooltip could present the > citation content - as if it where the content of the title attribute - and a > screen reader could speak it aloud after the quotation, and if the referred > <cite> contained a link, a click on the <blocquote> content (or any other kind > of activation) could open the linked page in another tab/window. That describes how it could be used, but _why_? Is there an actual problem that isn't solved today that needs solving? On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > The <cite> element solves the problem that if one considers <i> evil (I > don't) and one wants to conform to the Chicago Manual of Style and one > believes that <em> is semantically wrong for titles of work, without > <cite> there wouldn't be an appropriate element for italicizing titles > of work per CMoS in a way that doesn't depend on CSS being available. It also provides a way to style citations in a way different from other kinds of normally-italic text without using classes. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 30 November 2008 13:41:48 UTC