- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:40:57 +0100
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:46:48 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Adele Peterson wrote: >> I saw the need for this in our Web Inspector, which has a lot of custom >> controls (including some that use contenteditable elements). Some of >> these don't have a default focused appearance, but its nice that they >> can follow the focus pseudo-class CSS selector. >> >> I agree that the disabled attribute would fit in well with this. >> Again, it would be nice for these custom controls to be able to use the >> disabled pseudo-class CSS selector. > > I really would rather see XBL2's <div> element be extended to be > focusable and disablable rather than have HTML support this. Does that > make sense? How would you disable <td contenteditable> or <div contenteditable> with that strategy and have td:disabled and div:disabled (or something very close to it) work? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 28 November 2008 12:40:57 UTC