- From: Calogero Alex Baldacchino <alex.baldacchino@email.it>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:28:58 +0100
Ian Hickson ha scritto: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote: > >> In other words, the normative section of the spec will be as generic as >> possible, while a non-normative section will cover a bounch of use cases >> and examples, without pretending to be exahustive with regard to all >> possible use cases. Am I wrong? >> > > The examples in the spec are already in the spec in their expected final > location, so you can pretty much see what we intend to do by looking at > the spec today. > > http://whatwg.org/html5 > > There will be more examples in time, but that's the only real planned > difference of relevance here. > > But an example is just that, an explanation on a specification rule which adds nothing to its generic formulation but a clarification, without covering all possible scenarios, but only the more relevant for clarification sake, and might be labeled as non-normative. This is what I meant (specifically a 'logical' separation, not a 'physical' relocation, as opposit to a whole discarding of use cases). Sorry if I posted a messed up concept. -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: CheBanca! La prima banca che ti d? gli interessi in anticipo. * Fino al 4,70% sul Conto Deposito, zero spese e interessi subito. Aprilo! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7919&d=25-11
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 14:28:58 UTC