W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] Issues relating to the syntax of dates and times

From: Calogero Alex Baldacchino <alex.baldacchino@email.it>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:28:58 +0100
Message-ID: <492C7C2A.9040100@email.it>
Ian Hickson ha scritto:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
>> In other words, the normative section of the spec will be as generic as 
>> possible, while a non-normative section will cover a bounch of use cases 
>> and examples, without pretending to be exahustive with regard to all 
>> possible use cases. Am I wrong?
> The examples in the spec are already in the spec in their expected final 
> location, so you can pretty much see what we intend to do by looking at 
> the spec today.
>    http://whatwg.org/html5
> There will be more examples in time, but that's the only real planned 
> difference of relevance here.
But an example is just that, an explanation on a specification rule 
which adds nothing to its generic formulation but a clarification, 
without covering all possible scenarios, but only the more relevant for 
clarification sake, and might be labeled as non-normative. This is what 
I meant (specifically a 'logical' separation, not a 'physical' 
relocation, as opposit to a whole discarding of use cases). Sorry if I 
posted a messed up concept.
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 CheBanca! La prima banca che ti d? gli interessi in anticipo.
* Fino al 4,70% sul Conto Deposito, zero spese e interessi subito. Aprilo!
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7919&d=25-11
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 14:28:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC