- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:43:04 +0100
Am Montag, den 24.11.2008, 15:10 -0800 schrieb Jonas Sicking: > Note that the semantic meaning that HTML5 gives it is very weak. All it > says is that the text inside the <b> is different from the text outside > it. All the existing uses on the web that I've seen are correct > according to this semantic definition. Weak in this case means: Not of much semantic, probably only of presentational use. So can't we just mark all presentational elements as obsolete in a clear, consistenst way, instead of trying to redefine them ? Maybe put them into a "presentational annex" of the spec, that defines rendering of obsolete elements ? The thing I am concerned with is that if they are included like "normal" (read: semantic) elements, authors will probably use them for new pages. Cheers, Nils
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 17:43:04 UTC