- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:52:36 +0000
On 23 Nov 2008, at 20:11, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > I'm wondering whether: > > <dt>Jack White</dt> > <dd>foobar<p>baz</p><p>quux</p></dd> > > is equivalent to or different to: > > <dt>Jack White</dt> > <dd><p>foobar</p><p>baz</p><p>quux</p></dd> Semantically equivalent, though different in the trees they produce (in the former "foobar" is a text node child of the dd element, in the latter it is a text node child of the first p element child of the dd element). > and whether > > <dt>Jack White</dt> > <dd>foobar</dd> > > is equivalent to or different to: > > <dt>Jack White</dt> > <dd><p>foobar</p></dd> Same ? semantically equivalent, though different in the trees they produce (in the former "foobar" is a text node child of the dd element, in the latter it is a text node child of the p element child of the dd element). > Does DD have an implicit P, much as it has an implicit Q/BLOCKQUOTE? No: a run of text nodes (and phrasing content elements) is a paragraph, much like an explicit one created by the p element. <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#paragraphs > details this in-depth. -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 13:52:36 UTC