- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:03:29 +0000
Hello Philip Philip Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote: > >> [...] >> >> http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/linkrels.html >> >> [...] >> >> If you have a more up to date study on link relationships, please can I have >> a link? >> > > http://philip.html5.org/data/link-rel-rev.txt has some more recent > data, from a different set of pages (and so with different biases, > e.g. there's lots of Wikipedia and IMDB pages using > rel="apple-touch-icon"), with less processing (no case-insensitivity > or token-splitting). > > Thank you Philip that is the most useful set of data I have seen for a long time It basically says that the whole premise that HTML5 should drop *rev* (a) because authors use it wrong, (b) Many authors use rev-stylesheet wrong, is a MYTH and an inaccurate assessment of the *rev* attribute Out of the 127249 pages studied, only 0.09% actually use rev="stylesheet" Great stuff Thanks! -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 05:03:29 UTC