W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] Absent rev?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:03:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4922D925.9010504@danbri.org>
Dan Brickley wrote:

> Without rev, content creators (in every language) will need to go 
> through this dance, hunting through dictionaries and debating 
> subtleties, to make sure that they've identified a suitable pair of 
> words such that { X word1 Y } is true if and only if { Y word1 X }. 
> Which is why I see this in terms of division of labour. Cleaning it out 
> of HTML5 makes work elsewhere...

Sorry that should've been,

{ X word1 Y } is true if and only if { Y word2 X }.

Dan

ps. (since i'm mailing again, sorry) ... in an RDF/XML context, we had 
this issue in FOAF: we added 'depicts' alongside 'depiction' because the 
old RDF/XML syntax didn't deal well with inverses
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 07:03:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC