- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:53:26 +0100
Martin McEvoy wrote: > From the "real world" found here: > http://nfegen.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/micrordformats/ > > <p>I read an interesting post recently, <a > href="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2008/03/so-how-about-using-rdfa-in-microformats.html" > title="Link to Mark Birbeck blog post">?So how about using RDFa in > Microformats??</a>....</p> > > An explicit one way relationship I might like to add to the hyperlink > above may be rev="reply" > > <a rev="reply" > href="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2008/03/so-how-about-using-rdfa-in-microformats.html" > title="Link to Mark Birbeck blog post">?So how about using RDFa in > Microformats??</a> It seems the "real world" example you point to doesn't actually use such a relationship, so I don't see how it qualifies as being real world example in this case. In any case, if there was a real use case for such a relationship, then it rel="reply-to" would seem to be more appropriate. It's meaning would then be roughly analogous to that of the In-Reply-To email header field. (Although, I'm not convinced that there is a use case that really needs solving here, and speculating about the use of hypothetical relationships doesn't really provide any compelling evidence in support of the rev attribute.) -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 06:53:26 UTC