- From: Pentasis <pentasis@lavabit.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:03:20 +0200
Grouping and such is a stylistic concern, though - as long as the document expresses a footnote semantic, that's all it has to do. For the rest, we have a CSS Module that will cover that area, the Generated and Replaced Content module [1]. By an astonishing coincidence, the editor of this module is no less than Ian himself. [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/ ~TJ In that case why don't they drop the abbr, dfn, cite, mark etc. elements? They can be styled through CSS as well and be semantically determined by using a class-name just as sugested for footnotes. Bert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081101/3d710282/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 10:03:20 UTC