- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:38:05 +0200
The anchor customarily encompasses just the key phrase, not the whole text. The problem here is that the advertisements are not cooperative; they aggressively try to get in the reader's way. In your example, it would be more consistent to wrap the header text only. As an alternative, you can put a clickable empty transparency over the teaser. Is that what you meant by CSS tricks? Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Frank Hellenkamp Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:23 AM To: whatwg at whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace <a href> > I agree that this is an unconvincing example, but consider instead > banner ads that are created from a bunch of HTML markup rather than a > single image; they generally want the entire banner rectangle to be > "clickable" but make use of tables and all sorts of other strange things. I also think, that the banner is not a convincing example. But I step over different kinds of teaser (news- and article-teasers) during my work, that are made out of images, text and headlines. Now, you have to do this (without javascript): <div class="teaser"> <a href="link.html"><img src="image.png"></a> <h3><a href="link.html">newsteaser</a></h3> <p><a href="link.html">Text</a></p> <p><a href="link.html">Text</a></p> </div> If you are good, you also set the a-elements to "display: block" so that the whole area is clickable, not only the text. It would be *much* more simple/useful to have something like this: <div class="teaser" href="link.html"> <img src="image.png"> <h3>newsteaser</h3> <p>Text</p> <p>Text</p> </div> Or this: <a href="link.html"> <div class="teaser"> <img src="image.png"> <h3>newsteaser</h3> <p>Text</p> <p>Text</p> </div> </a> By the way: It would be more accessible with the mouse in this case, because the clicking-area is much bigger (without css-tricks). best regards frank
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 01:38:05 UTC