- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:57:12 +0300
On May 22, 2008, at 12:23, Ian Hickson wrote: > EUC-KR -> Windows-949 > KS_C_5601-1987 -> Windows-949 FWIW, x-windows-949 would be more correct given the current IANA situation. The list is missing tis-620, x-iso-8859-11 and iso-8859-11 which should turn into x-windows-874. > Let me know if you have any more information, e.g. an exact list of > what should be a conformance error in each of those > cases. After pondering the usefulness of conformance errors in this area, I'm inclined to think that there should be no particular errors when in coding name aliasing happens. This means that I would even suggest removing the C1 range bytes as errors when ISO-8859-1 turns into Windows-1252. My rationale is that the cost/benefit characteristics of reporting theoretical wrongness in this area are unfavorable. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 03:57:12 UTC