- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 02:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Sylvain Pasche wrote: > > I'm working on an experimental project to build a set of cross browser > automated tests. The idea would be to have a repository of browser > independent automated tests. Existing test suites could be imported into > it. > > Would WHATWG be interested in such a project? I think that would be great; if you do go ahead with this, you are welcome to use the WHATWG wiki and other resources. I encourage you to use the implementors mailing list for this: http://www.whatwg.org/mailing-list#imps > To meet these goals, such an API should be as unobtrusive as possible: > * One .js file to include I recommend not embedding any JS, but instead requiring that the following two lines be used to report results (or something like them): if (parent.reportResults) parent.reportResults(...); ...and using <iframe>s to embed the tests one after another. I use something similar for my performance tests: http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/perf/ This makes the test even easier to maintain, and also makes it a lot easier to reimplement the harness or to share tests between hardnesses. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 19:51:45 UTC