- From: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 21:38:34 -0700
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Garen wrote: > > > > 1.4 > > "when not qualified to explicitly refer" > > when not qualified explicitly to refer > > (split infinitive) > > I prefer the current text. How about "when not qualified to refer explicitly" ? > > 3.3.3.1 > > > > "For instance, the script elements is allowed inside head elements" > > For instance, the script element is allowed inside the head element > > (typo) > > I don't understand the mistake. Noun/verb plurality agreement error. "elements is allowed" should either be "element is allowed" or "elements are allowed". > > 8.2.1 > > "do not have to actually create a DOM Document object" > > do not actually have to create a DOM Document object > > (split infinitive) > > I prefer the split version. FWIW I prefer the non-split version as well. But I am a grammar Nazi :) PK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080506/f64ef246/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 21:38:34 UTC