W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2008

[whatwg] <link rel=icon width="" height="">

From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@osiolki.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 21:57:16 +0100
Message-ID: <op.uao8hqis4suneb@cpc2-acto9-0-0-cust930>
I don't think it's that important to specify exact icon sizes. Authors  
won't bother to accurately provide such detailed information, and  
applications don't need it anyway.

iPhone shouldn't be a concern here. It isn't limited to 59x60  
icons?Apple's own website uses 129x129  
(http://www.apple.com/apple-touch-icon.png) and current EDGE network  
iPhones won't use anything else than rel=apple-touch-icon.

My suggestion is to simply define rel=application-icon without extra  

There isn't much bandwidth to be saved. These icons are going to be  
downloaded only once. 128x128 PNG icons take only 20-30kb.

Large PNG file + favicon for smallest sizes may be good enough in most  
cases. In cases when icon design doesn't scale well, authors could provide  
additional .ico/.icns files.

When website provides application icons (not favicon) in .icns or .ico  
files, I think it can be reasonably assumed that these files contain all  
sizes that are needed for desktop icons, and it doesn't matter which  

regards, Kornel Lesi?ski
Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 13:57:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:02 UTC