W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2008

[whatwg] Some <video> questions

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:45:10 +0200
Message-ID: <000101c8ac63$262aad50$4d01010a@IBM42F76C011DF>
I am not sure what you had in mind.  It seems irrelevant whether the video
stream is embedded or linked from another location or using a different
transport; it is still a video stream and the QuickTime player only displays
it.  On the other hand, Shockwave Flash is Turing-complete.  That is a big
difference.  I am very disappointed.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 6:50 AM
To: 'WHAT working group'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Some <video> questions

> Your movie showed as a grey square and hanged Internet Explorer
> and I had to log out.  Was that intended?

It's an ordinary QuickTime Movie and works fine.

The content is irrelevant, but it shows that the files one will embed with
<video> often won't actually contain any video media.  This will be the case
with every metafile format (.asx, .sdp, etc.), and nearly all modern
container formats (.mov, .asf, .swf) that can reference media that lives
elsewhere.

-- Charles
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 07:45:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:02 UTC