- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:53:27 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > In WA 1.0 and WF 2.0 some values are required to be IRIs and some values > are required to be IRI references. I'm confused about what exactly this > means in terms of conformance checking. (WF 2.0 does say something about > processing in a browser, though.) [...] > > I'd appreciate some guidance on which enforcement options to use. (E.g. > should knowledge of the http scheme used? Should security issues be > flagged as non-conforming? Should "SHOULD" violations be flagged as > non-conforming? Etc.) I've tried to make this clear in the spec, but to some extent what's valid or not is out of scope of HTML5 itself. What can I do to help more? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 14:53:27 UTC