- From: Shannon <shannon@arc.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:35:11 +1000
I agree this is _mostly_ a CSS issue except that there is semantic meaning to the join attribute beyond layout. The attribute could serve as a guide to search engines, web-scrapers or WYSIWYG applications that two areas of the page should be considered a single piece of content. I am also unsure as to how this might affect other aspects of browser, javascript or DOM behaviour. There may be other uses or side-effects I can't imagine. At any rate CSS cannot associate elements so the join attribute should be considered independent of the style considerations as a means of saying "this block follows that one". Nonetheless I will do as you suggest. Shannon Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Shannon wrote: > >> Something I think is really missing from HTML is "linked text" (in the >> traditional desktop publishing sense), where two or more text boxes are >> joined so that content overflows the first into the second and >> subsequent boxes. This is a standard process for practically all >> multi-column magazines, books and news layouts. It is especially >> valuable for column layouts where the information is dynamic and >> variable in length and therefore cannot be manually balanced. This is >> not something that can be solved server-side since the actual flow is >> dependent on user style-sheets, viewport and font-size. >> > > I agree that this would be a useful feature for the Web platform. However, > I believe the CSS working group is a better venue for exploring such > options. I recommend forwarding your proposal to www-style at w3.org. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080801/38b77960/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 22:35:11 UTC