- From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:28:09 +0100
Nicholas Shanks writes: > On 30 Jul 2008, at 4:49 am, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > I don't see how this is a benefit over <img>. > > In order of importance to me: > > 1. It's spelt correctly. > 3. It's spelt correctly. Having both <img> and <image> elements in HTML doing different things would be confusing. Many people currently pronounce "img" as "image", so it would be very hard to distinguish between these elements when talking about images. Smylers
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 07:28:09 UTC