- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Garrett Smith wrote:
>
> Citation from:
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#outlines
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The following JavaScript function shows how the tree walk could be
> implemented. [...]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This code cannot be interpreted in a compliant implementation of
> EcmaScript. It has more syntax errors than I can count. It is unclear
> what the author thinks this code will do. If its intent were clearer,
> and the syntax errors fewer, it might be possible for me to help out by
> fixing them. The above code is not even close to ECMA262.
Fixed. As far as I can tell, the only problem was an extraneous "do". I
tested the code after removing the odd extra "do" and it worked fine.
Tested by calling the function "test" and evaluating the following:
var s = "";
test(document,
function (a) { s += "enter " + a + "\n"; },
function (a) { s += "exit " + a + "\n"; });
s
The output was what I expected. There were no syntax errors. Could you
elaborate on what else you think is wrong other than the "do"?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:42:07 UTC