- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:52:28 +0200
Archive: is not generic enough but perhaps you could bend the URL notation to embrace something like inside:. I still would not recommend it but it would not make me that sore. How about <inside:local/path.html?container=http://www.site.com/app.jar>? The user agent would be required to append a query string to local hyperlinks and that parameter would be reserved (or rename it to h809370dfwhbwa0r92347090). Of course this URL scheme would never leak to HTTP. OTOH, you can simulate several entry points by having all supported entry points on the start page (? la Microsoft Access) and have the user navigate to what she needs. I do not think this would be prohibitive from the customer?s point of view. And I am sure there is no need to publish each local address. Chris _____ From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:55 AM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: Adrian Sutton; Adam Barth; whatwg at whatwg.org; Russell Leggett; Philipp Serafin Subject: Re: [whatwg] Application deployment On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote: My complaint was about how the jar URL scheme wannabe conceptually differs from the schemes we already officially have, not about how ugly it is to have two consecutive colons. It is ugly but it does not matter. What matters is that a scheme is being promoted that is specific to one content type, just as the APPLET element is discouraged for the same reason. Suppose it was called "archive:" instead of "jar:" and the spec was made open-ended so that other archive types other than ZIP files were permitted. Would your objection still apply? Anyway, it is not obvious at all that linking inside a packaged HTML application should be supported. Multiple entry points to a single application are common. Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080729/2378a3ba/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:52:28 UTC