- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:40:25 +0200
Non sequitur now that we have allowed expando data attributes on anything, sequeretur otherwise. An OBJECT element need not be visible; in Microsoft parlance, can be an application that defragments your hard drive upon request or enables you manage the page with a Perl script; I would not expect an EMBED element to do that. Note that I understand Ian's points and I am not arguing. I only want you to understand what I meant the other time. Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:12 AM To: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org Subject: [whatwg] <embed> feedback On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > > The embed element should be deprecated because of the expando feature > that makes it so special. I don't understand the "because" here. This seems like a non-seqitur. > I understand that having both embed and object can capture some semantic > differences where "embed" means "display" and "object" means "run" but > breaking the fixed interface rule weighs more than introducing this > distinction IMHO. I don't understand.
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 11:40:25 UTC