- From: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:02:46 -0400
I'm not sure what it means when you say: a.. URLs: Workers should be spawned from URLs, not from strings, since script rarely has access to its own source. could you elucidate a bit more? Doesn't JavaScript usually have access to its own source? I'm not sure when it doesn't. and isn't JavaScript still the primary client side scripting vehicle in HTML5? David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> To: <whatwg at whatwg.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:30 PM Subject: [whatwg] Workers > > Based on popular demand (and threats that without a spec implementations > would proceed regardless) I have started collecting use cases and > requirements for a specification for background worker scripts ("threads") > in JavaScript: > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/#requirements > > Any feedback would be greately appreciated, especially from authors > involved in large Web applications who would make significant use of such > a feature, and from implementors of browsers that may support this. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:02:46 UTC