- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Adele Peterson wrote: > > The spec currently states that the poster image specified in the poster > attribute for <video> can show up either when no video data is available > or when a video element is paused and the current playback position is > the first frame of video. > > The second situation seems like it would allow the poster image to be > displayed when a user rewinds the video back to the beginning while > paused. I think it would make more sense to just allow the poster image > to be displayed if the readyState is less than CAN_PLAY, instead of > considering the paused state. The paused state will always be true when > the readyState is less than CAN_PLAY, but with this rule, the poster > image won't randomly show up in other situations where the video is > paused and you're at the beginning. On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Philip J?genstedt wrote: > > The current spec allows implementing it like this, but I support the > change as it takes away that unnecessary ambiguity. On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > Looking at the way YouTube videos work when they're not set to autoplay, > the poster frame is displayed up until the video begins playing for the > first time. After that, it always displays whatever frame it's paused > on, until it reaches the end and displays related videos instead. I've tweaked the poster frame definition to still _allow_ the same behaviours, but to strongly encourage (SHOULD) that the poster frame be shown until video is shown and not thereafter. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 15:58:43 UTC