- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:52:27 -0400
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:17:50 -0400, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ has some usage of "same-origin" while >> it seems that the intention is for it to be all "same origin". I'd >> prefer if it was all "same origin" (apart from tokens, of course) as >> that's what I/I'll use in XLMHttpRequest et al. > > The intent is to use "same-origin" when the term is used as an adjective > and "same origin" when it is used as a noun phrase. That, as far as I > understand, is correct English grammar. Actually I am pretty sure that either are correct in the context of an attempt to describe the usage that constitutes "english grammar". English grammar, unlike many other languages, does not have a formal definition, nor any body capable of making one. This lack of formal precision is a drawback when using it to describe technical things - but one counterbalanced by the fact that many of the people who want to understand the descriptions have some level of familiarity with it. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 09:52:27 UTC