- From: WeBMartians <webmartians@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:31:46 -0500
Arrgh! My mistake; it's late here. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Tuesday, 2008 January 29 21:27 To: WeBMartians Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Question Regarding <table> width On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, WeBMartians wrote: > > Is > width="0" > a pathological (error) state for <table>? > > ...and, for that matter, <tr>, <td> and the other tabular tags... > > I may have just missed this, but I don't see any explicit restriction > on zero (or negative) widths. HTML5 doesn't allow the 'width' attribute on <table> at all. > I wonder if such values could be used to allow browsers to render > floating tables: side-by-side tables for large displays and vertically > sequenced tables for small ones, such as in mobile devices. That seems like a presentational issue, which would be best handled by the CSS working group. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 18:31:46 UTC