- From: Charles <lists07@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:34:46 -0800
Maciej, > Actually, many QuickTime codec plugins are quite popular... I guess "popular" is relative. The installed base of the most popular set of 3rd-party QuickTime components (Flip4Mac WM) is miniscule compared to Linux installed base, and is closer to 5,000 than 50,000. > Flash isn't a video codec, there's no such thing as encoding video > "as Flash". I'll gladly rephrase as "using compressed media formats supported by the version of Flash one is targeting, to a container format supported by the version of Flash one is targeting, intended for playback using the targeted version of the Flash runtime" if that helps. > Flash is not a video format. Thanks, I have a good understanding of what Flash is. :^) > Here's some interesting MPEG content served without flash wrappers: <http://www.apple.com/trailers/> No, those are QuickTime Movies that happen to use MPEG-4 codecs. They're not MPEG-4 files. So, my questions remain. What I'm hearing is that (1) <video> will only be a cross-browser, cross-platform solution for exactly one format -- that freely implementable and royalty free combination of container and compressed video and audio formats -- and that (2) from a design perspective <video> transport controls may be any size (or no size at all if the browser vendor prefers overlays), requiring designers to roll their own if they need controls to be a predictable size. Am I crazy, or is there an opportunity to fix this before <video> joins <blink>? :O) --- Charles
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 13:34:46 UTC