- From: David Walbert <dwalbert@learnnc.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:40:21 -0500
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: > Surely it should be numbered with the step. > > ... > > 6. Foo > 4. Bar > 2. Baz I can see either way being useful in theory, but I haven't seen a use case for reverse-ordered list where the the step is not -1 -- nor one with negative-numbered list items. Can anybody cite one or propose one? _____ David Walbert LEARN NC UNC-Chapel Hill
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 16:40:21 UTC