W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2008

[whatwg] SQL storage and onunload

From: Geoffrey Garen <ggaren@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:01:46 -0800
Message-ID: <9C986EA5-C72F-4EAE-AFC7-EBBC59AFC775@apple.com>
> It seems to be a natural idea to save Web application state from an  
> unload event handler. But is it guaranteed that client-side database  
> API is still functional at this point? And if it is - can one queue  
> up more statements and/or transactions from statement callbacks?

I see two options here:

1. Delay leaving the page indefinitely, until all outstanding database  
operations have completed.

2. Leave the page immediately, canceling all outstanding database  

Option #1 seems undesirable because it allows a malicious or poorly  
programmed website to hijack the browser. That's a pretty bad user  
experience -- one that the database API's asynchronous callbacks were  
specifically designed to avoid.

Option #2 is not ideal, but it's workable. A beforeunload event  
handler can detect unsaved changes and prompt the user to cancel the  
navigation and save. Once the save succeeds, the page can update its  
UI to indicate that navigation is OK.

So, I recommend option #2.


On Feb 8, 2008, at 1:44 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:

>  There needs to be some limits put on this, as otherwise a script  
> could continue to use resources indefinitely after a browser window  
> is closed. But I do not see where it is specified, explicitly or  
> implicitly.
> - WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 13:01:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:00 UTC