- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:14:36 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Dave Camp wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > I just checked in a change to make globalStorage far simpler -- I > > dropped all the domain manipulation stuff, and made it same-origin > > instead. I also dropped StorageItem and just made the Storage stuff > > return strings. > > Perhaps the new globalStorage object should be renamed while making this > change? This will let us deprecate globalStorage a bit more gracefully > (clients checking for its existence won't get an object that behaves > differently than expected). > > Perhaps "localStorage"? > > That still won't help users of StorageItem.value, but it might be useful > anyway. Done. I love the irony of the fact that we just renamed _global_ storage to _local_ storage without changing anything of the semantics... -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 9 February 2008 01:14:36 UTC