- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:52:41 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Shannon wrote: > > For what it's worth the changes to persistent storage have my vote. As a > web author and user it strikes the right balance between functionality > and privacy. Just one thing though, since this storage could also be > used for 'offline applications' should some mention be made regarding > access from a page hosted at 127.0.0.1 or via the file: protocol? I'm not sure what to say. Could you elaborate on your suggestion? > Also I was curious about what Firefox was putting in mine but it looks > like I need a 3rd-party sqlite app to do it. Should the spec recommend > user-agents provide a direct method of access (even though some data may > be base64 or obsfucated)? I don't think the spec should really talk about this, since it doesn't affect interoperability. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 20:52:41 UTC