- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:18:25 +1100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Filippo Levizzani wrote: > > > > > > Would it be possible to have "media" attribute in the SCRIPT > > > element? Addmitted vaues would be the same of STYLE element (all, > > > screen, print, handheld ...) > > > > This doesn't really work because media queries are supposed to change > > dynamically. The real solution here is a combination of XBL2 and a new > > API in the CSSOM-View draft (window.media). > > I can see the value in this (but then, I also see the value in media > types in styling - something it seems some browser makers are not really > interested in), and I agree with David's concern that it can have some > pretty costly implications. I don't really understand what you mean here. How are browser vendors not interested in media types in styling? What has costly implications? What implications? > Can you explain why XBL2 is part of the solution here? It seems you have > something in mind that I don't understand yet. Media-specific scripting is usually needed for media-specific presentation or widgets. XBL2 is a way to define widgets, and it can be bound in a media-specific way. Thus for instance one could create a set of widgets for different window widths, and they would dynamically be swapped in as the user changed the window size. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 28 December 2008 21:26:58 UTC