- From: Philip Taylor <excors+whatwg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:41:55 +0000
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Edward Z. Yang <edwardzyang at thewritingpot.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I think EOF should be handled explicitly in the states after we "Consume > the U+0023 NUMBER SIGN," since the spec as it stands right now implies > that there will always be another character after the number sign. Or am > I being a little redundant? EOF is always treated as if it were a character, e.g. lots of places say "Consume the next input character: ... EOF -> ... Reconsume the EOF character in the data state". If you have "&#" at the end of a file, the next character is the EOF character, which is not 'x' or 'X' and so it is "anything else". So it seems consistent and unambiguous to me. -- Philip Taylor excors at gmail.com
Received on Monday, 22 December 2008 13:41:55 UTC