- From: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:30:42 +0100
Ian Hickson schrieb: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up >>> anyway. >>> I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still >>> lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved. >>> The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed to >>> "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate >>> Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago. >>> Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really >>> handled differently? >>> >> They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-) >> > > Actually in this instance it's the spec that will be fixed in due course. > > Thanks for the info. Didn't know mere mortals could edit that section ;) Regards, Philipp Serafin
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 05:30:42 UTC