- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:02:30 +0100
2008/12/16 Nils Dagsson Moskopp < nils-dagsson-moskopp at dieweltistgarnichtso.net> > Am Dienstag, den 16.12.2008, 14:32 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Campagna: > > > (The same behaviour can be achieved also with a @namespace rule, > > putting non-standard attributes in an application-specific namespace) > > Since data attributes do not exist as of yet, I believe people would use > XML for namespaces, so I somehow don't see your problem. > > 1) data attributes are not standarized and the "dataset" DOMStringMap is not present, but if you try using them with domCore interfaces they should work (i haven't tested though) 2) XML serialization is much more difficlut to implement than old HTML, and, as i said before, in many cases it is not implementable at all: probably a company which hosts user-generated content such as blogs or forums won't like that no browser can display his pages because someone wrote invalid html even the most experienced can mis-type code, and in that case the only way to solve is to manually edit source using a plain text editor, which is not possible with user-generated content 3) the "dataset" DOMStringMap is a quite useful way to enumerate attributes explicitly marked as "application data" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081216/45878573/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 06:02:30 UTC