- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:14:16 +0100
Maybe so-called "invalid" HTML attributes are not the only solution, but in my opinion it is a simple way to embed metadata within any element. Imagine that such markup is then passed to a web application through XHR. In that case scripts aren't parsed and executed. In this case you have three ways to attach a behaviour: 2) on-event standard attributes (but they not performant since they're parsed every time the event fires and the cannot include chars like > or ", they need to be escaped) 3) assigning a "class" and some metadata using "data-", then getElementsByClassName and addEventListener The same with CSS: you can use "style" for each element or "data-" attributes queried by attr() For what concerns browser support, these attributes are at all part of the DOM tree, so I can pass their names to getAttribute and setAttribute, but they don't get any special interface. It's the same in the XML serialization with different application-specific namespaces: they use only DOMAttr interface defined in DOM3Core and they're not part of any infoset (not part of ID list or NAME list) Personally I prefer the latter (XML) solution, but there are context where using XML serialization is not possibile (for example in user generated content) so there is a definite need for a SGML way to add custom attributes without conflicting with standards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081216/22a589be/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 05:14:16 UTC