- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:05:54 +0100
Now that the pixelratio override is gone, shouldn't the influence of pixel aspect ratio on the layout be removed also? I would prefer if the default were to stretch to fit if both width/height are given, just like for img. Letterboxing/pillarboxing should be the special case, is the idea that we should have the equivalent of SVG:s preserveAspectRatio either via CSS or HTML? Philip On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:15 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Peter Kasting wrote: > > > > > > I don't understand why this attribute would cause problems. Can you > > > elaborate? > > > > * Authors specify the wrong ratio, causing videos to look worse * > > Authors, blindly copy-and-pasting, believe this attribute is required > > and specify it everywhere, increasing the likelihood of both of these > > bullet points > > > > If you think the likelihood of the first bullet is low, consider the > > confusion evident on this thread, and then extend that to authors who > > have even less of a clue. The attribute is confusing because your > > intended use -- as a hack that people shouldn't use -- is confusing. > > > > Videos encoded at the wrong aspect ratio are a real problem, but they > > are one of an extremely large number of real problems, most of which we > > (rightly) are not trying to solve. I think you have given a few reasons > > why we _aren't_ trying to solve others. I don't understand why we're > > trying to solve this one. > > > > I don't think it is the end of the world if this attribute goes in, but > > I see very little benefit to it, and I am always for removing items with > > marginal utility. > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Chris Double wrote: > > > > I'm inclined to agree. I think it's odd that an attribute is being added > > to fix video's encoded incorrectly. Why can't the author of the video > > fix the actual video? > > > > One of the arguments for captions being embedded in video's rather than > > having some way of defining captions by the page author was that it's > > important not to use HTML to fix broken videos, and allow captions to > > travel with the file. The same argument could be made for pixel ratio. > > Fixing it in the HTML means everyone linking to the file using <video> > > will need to remember to add pixelratio to their HTML. Better to fix the > > file. > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > > > Ah, makes sense. Wasn't there once upon a time a CSS draft that let you > > specify how replaced elements should stretch in situations like this? So > > you could choose if it should zoom-to-fit (like it sounds like <video> > > does) or stretch-to-fit (like <img> does), zoom-to-fill as well as a few > > other things. I can't seem to find it though... > > > > I guess my point is, can we let CSS deal with this? If it indeed needs > > to be dealt with. > > Fair enough. I've removed the pixelratio attribute. > -- Philip J?genstedt Opera Software
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 03:05:54 UTC