[whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

WHATWG cannot purge existing ignored elements and properties but it can try
avoiding adding new ones.
Besides, I wonder if the promoter of the DFN element make it clear that he
expected it to be ignored by the browser, as is the case with RDFa.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Toby A Inkster
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 10:28 PM
To: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

Kristof Zelechovski wrote:

> The goal of the specification is to provide a set of rules that  
> conformant
> user agents must obey out of the box, without any extensions.   
> Features that
> are supposed to be ignored do not make good candidates for  
> including in the
> specification, except as extensions to HTML that are explicitly  
> supported.

The HTML 5 spec already includes the many features which browsers  
currently (mostly) ignore - the <meta> tag, the "type" attribute on  
most links and so on. The fact that HTML includes a <dfn> element  
doesn't mean that every browser has to have a built in dictionary for  
storing all the definitions people collect on the web, but the  
element is there for those people who want to use it. Browsers  
*could* do something useful with <dfn> if they liked, but none so far  
seem to have done so.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 13:35:26 UTC