- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:55:49 +0200
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:08:37 +0200, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> The idea and premise of RDF is sort of attractive (people being able to >> do their own thing, unified data model, etc), though I agree with others >> that the complexity (lengthy URIs, ***qname***/curie cruft) is an issue. > > We do not use QName's in RDFa - there is not QName/CURIE cruft! We went > to great lengths to avoid QNames, please take the time to understand why > (it's because of the cruft that you complain about): As far as I can tell they both have the same (subset of) problems. They create a level of indirection and require keeping namespace prefix declarations around. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 06:55:49 UTC