- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:10:48 +0200
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:00:09 +0200, Russell Leggett <russell.leggett at gmail.com> wrote: > I actually think that using custom microformat-like conventions with > classes or tags is really not as robust a solution as what is being > attempted with RDFa (I honestly did not know much about RDFa before this > conversation). > However, while people keep suggesting classes, I have yet to hear anyone > suggest the data- attributes. Maybe it was said or implied elsewhere, > but it seems like a good fit here. Instead of requiring the addition of > "about" or "property" attributes, just use "data-about" or > "data-property". It may not be ideal, but it fits with the existing spec. Actually, data- attributes are not intended for this purpose. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 05:10:48 UTC