W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2008

[whatwg] RDFa

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:53:14 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0808241353w895a265r984386f03da39a8f@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>wrote:

> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> The point was made before that html5 already has extensive extension
>> mechanisms in place that can address the particular needs of various
>> communities without requiring it to be written explicitly into the spec.  I
>> know you've said that your team has reviewed the extension mechanisms and
>> found them lacking, but could you explain why it is insufficient to use
>> @data-rdf-property, @data-rdf-about, etc.?  I ask
> > about these specifically because my mail timestamps show that the
> > @data-* class of attributes was introduced April 10th of this year,
> > while the ccRel submission is dated May 1st, and thus it's very likely
> > that these were impossible to consider during your review of existing
> > extension mechanisms.
> > ...
> "Custom data attributes are intended to store custom data private to the
> page or application, for which there are no more appropriate attributes or
> elements." -- <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#custom>

I'm confused.  Are you trying to imply that my suggestion is somehow against
the spec definition?  If so, please accompany your quoting of the spec with
an actual explanation of your point.  I cannot respond to you when I
essentially have to imagine your entire argument for myself first.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080824/14a396d9/attachment.htm>
Received on Sunday, 24 August 2008 13:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:04 UTC