ALTGROUP is a dirty trick; if you insist on having the images separate, which you really should not do, you can have <image alt="3/5" ><img src="part1.png" /><img src="part2.png" /><img src="part3.png" ></image > This extension would be closer to the meaning IMHO. Otherwise, what happens if the images that belong to the same ALTGROUP of yours are not contiguous? Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Shannon Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 1:30 PM To: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] ALT and equivalent representation What about this as a possible solution? <img src="part1.png" altgroup="rating"> <img src="part2.png" altgroup="rating"> <img src="part3.png" altgroup="rating"> <altgroup id="rating" value="3/5"> I don't think this would raise any serious implementation issues as the logic is quite simple; If all elements in an altgroup are unavailable then display the value of the altgroup tag. The alt attribute would then be optional where altgroup is defined but required in all other cases. ShannonReceived on Monday, 28 April 2008 13:56:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:02 UTC