- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > > Just a few issues regarding the use of abbr and dfn elements. > > > > > > *The abbr Element's title Attribute* > > > > > > I think the title attribute should also be allowed to be omitted from the > > > abbr element if there is another abbr element with a title attribute for > > > the same abbreviation in the document. This would be very useful for > > > cases where the same abbreviation is used multiple times, but is not > > > defined (using <dfn>) anywhere in the document. > > > > Why would that instance not use <dfn>? > > It's quite common to use abbreviations without defining what they mean > the first time they're used in each document. > > So in a document that discusses, for example, something about HTML and > marks up the first instance as <abbr title="Hypertext Markup > Language">HTML</abbr>, but doesn't actually define what HTML is, it > wouldn't be appropriate to use <dfn>. The idea was that subsequent > instances of of the abbreviation would be marked up without the title > attribute, but that would only be useful with the cross-referencing > feature. Sure. In such cases the first case would say <abbr title="Hypertext Markup Language">HTML</abbr>, and the others would just be marked up as "HTML", with no markup. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2008 17:23:19 UTC