- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:53:10 -0500
Doh! I apologize. This has not been one of my shiniest moments. In addition to what Aaron says, I actually meant the reverse: only name and version being required (potentially with version optional, as he suggests), and display name and estimated size being optional. :DG< On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Aaron Boodman <aa at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Timothy Hatcher <timothy at apple.com> wrote: > > Name and version is not just used for UI, it is used to specify what > > database to open and to prevent schema conflicts. > > Whoops, yeah. This request actually originally comes from me, and what > I was referring to was the version parameter to open(). > > It can currently be the empty string, but it cannot be omitted. Any > reason why not? Some (most?) applications will not need this field and > it seems unfortunate to force them to pass an empty string. > > - a >
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 09:53:10 UTC